Another quick post pointing you toward something interesting. Studio Daily is a web resource for all kinds of production matters, from cutting edge technology to training resources to general production related material, but there was a post on there recently that caught our attention. We’ve waited until now because the responses seem to have petered out at last but it did provoke some interesting debate.

The short version is this “the availability and affordability of high end home editing systems means that the majority of the newest generation of editors don’t know squat about editing”.

The interesting distinction to be made is that it doesn’t say these people can’t edit, rather they don’t know, don’t understand or don’t care about the tricks of the trade, etiquette, useful planning techniques, technical details, traditions, inside-knowledge, trade secrets, workflows, standards, practices, finishing techniques, secret handshakes and (with a raised eyebrow) work ethics and that have built up over the last century.

If you’re an editor its worth a read, regardless of which side of the argument you fall down on. But if you’re not an editor then its absolutely worth a read because it explains the difference between editing and being an editor and demonstrates how hard it is to tell the difference between the two.

The Studio Daily blog is here.

Hi, Simon here. As an editor here at Oakslade I get to see a lot of lovely, crisp HD footage pass through my edit suite on a daily basis. I always enjoy sitting down and cutting this together according to the client’s brief.

Something strikes me as odd though. People always seem to forget about sound. I’m not sure why, obviously its one of the two key senses we use when watching film and TV. So for me, nothing we do here feels complete without a good soundtrack. I’ve seen many corporate films in the past where its clear that 95% of the client’s focus has been on the image and the soundtrack is an afterthought, usually just dropping any old royalty free soundtrack on the bottom as background music to finish it off.

Sometimes people recognise the need for a voiceover but haven’t budgeted for a professional voiceover artist. In our experience these people are called artists for a reason. As Oakslade has it’s own recording studio clients will sometimes ask us to just grab someone from the office and whilst we understand that ‘cash is king’ this just doesn’t do all of this gorgeous footage justice. No-one in the office sounds like Don LaFontaine so films made in this way, without the proper budget or planning never reach their full potential. Which is a shame because the hard work is always already done.

I think what I’m trying to say here is to always remember that sound is just as important as the image. If you were able to watch Blackhawk Down without the sound effects, I think you might get what I’m on about.

Even better, watch this:

Until you ask someone who does.

Bear with me. It’ll makes sense in a minute.

I had a weekend of watching foreign language movies. It wasn’t deliberate, it just happened to turn out that way. But the ones that I watched all happened to be really very good. Apocalypto on Friday night, The Lives of Others on Saturday afternoon then The Orphanage on Saturday night. The opening of Apocalypto works particularly well. Perhaps they were trying to get over the language barrier (its in Yucatec Mayan), but there’s no dialogue at all for the first five minutes or so. Without dialogue or explanation the editor, John Wright, conveys a huge amount of information simply through judicious shot selection. We spend our days striving to use visual imagery to reinforce our client’s message however it is always worth checking out how our Hollywood cousins do it.

Fortunately we have people here who do that sort of thing for us too.